CEO Dr. jur. Can Ansay on the validity of online citizen tests and compulsory vaccination

In an exclusive interview with Tagesschau.de, CEO Dr. jur. Can Ansay gives his view on the controversial online citizen tests, the vaccination requirement and the mass email petitions. According to Ansay, the negative corona test certificates offered by his website DrAnsay.com, which are based on self-tests, are legal and are recognized by numerous employers.

Online citizen tests in focus

Dr. Ansay emphasizes that his platform has already issued over a million online citizen tests and that over 400,000 users have given positive feedback. He sees his tests as necessary to increase pressure on the government and combat the corona pandemic. He also explains that the current legal framework is not final and can change at any time.

Legal situation and acceptance

Dr. Ansay describes the discussion about the validity of online test certificates as exaggerated. He argues that the legal regulations are currently not clear enough and calls for the government to adapt them. According to the Federal Ministry of Labor, the tests he offers are unproblematic because they can be carried out by laypeople and the risk of infection is minimized.

Compulsory Vaccination and its Legal Basis

When asked about compulsory vaccination, Ansay is skeptical and describes it as potentially unconstitutional. He demands that before such measures are introduced, it must be proven that tested unvaccinated people are more contagious than vaccinated people. He also stresses the need for milder measures before resorting to such drastic measures.

mass petition and civil rights

Regarding the mass petition emails, Dr. Ansay says that these were democratically investigated and are intended to alert health ministries to the need for his free online citizen tests. He criticizes the authorities for ignoring or even deleting these emails, which he says is a violation of citizens‘ rights.

Competition Authority and Legal Challenges

Finally, Dr. Ansay comments on a warning from the competition authority, which accuses him of failing to issue test and recovery certificates. He considers this demand to be unfounded and refers to the legal basis of his services.

„